Will I be put on the DBS barred list?

It depends on the offence. There are three routes: automatic barring with no right to make representations, automatic barring where you can make representations, and discretionary barring. Which applies depends on the offence and your circumstances. Only the DBS can tell you, and your solicitor can advise.

Will I be struck off or lose my professional registration?

This depends on your profession's regulator, for example the GMC for doctors, the NMC for nurses and midwives, Social Work England, or the Teaching Regulation Agency, and is separate from any DBS barring decision. Regulators can investigate and act even without a criminal conviction, and generally use a lower standard of proof than a criminal court. You should tell your professional body and your union or defence organisation as early as possible.

Can I keep my anonymity?

In the legal process, not reliably. Once charged, your name can generally be reported. What is genuinely confidential is reaching out to us, you don't have to give your name to get in touch.

Will I lose my job?

After the legal process itself, this is often the next biggest worry, especially for anyone working, or hoping to work, with children or vulnerable adults, or in a regulated profession. This page explains, in general terms, the two separate systems that can affect this: DBS barring, and professional fitness to practise.

This is general information, not a prediction of your outcome. Every profession's regulator works differently, and outcomes depend on your specific circumstances. This isn't legal or regulatory advice. If you're in a regulated role, tell your professional body, your union, or a defence organisation as early as you're able to.

DBS barring, separate from any criminal case

The Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) maintains two lists: the Children's Barred List and the Adults' Barred List. Anyone in "regulated activity", working regularly with children or vulnerable adults, teachers, nurses, doctors, carers, dentists, social workers, and some other roles such as taxi drivers, needs an Enhanced DBS check that includes a barred list check.

The DBS can add someone to a barred list in three ways:

Automatic barring, with no right to make representations: for certain serious offences listed in legislation, the DBS must bar you and has no discretion.

Automatic barring, with a right to make representations: for other listed offences, you can put your case to the DBS before a decision is made. The DBS also checks whether you have, or might in future have, a link to regulated activity.

Discretionary barring: no particular offence triggers this. The DBS can decide to bar when there is evidence of relevant conduct or a risk of harm, and a link to regulated activity. Referrals usually come from employers and similar bodies.

Which route applies depends on the offence and your circumstances. Only the DBS can tell you, and your solicitor can advise.

Being on a barred list makes it a further criminal offence to work, or try to work, in the activity you're barred from. It's separate from, and in addition to, any sentence given by a court.

Professional fitness to practise

If you're registered with a professional regulator, this is a separate process again, run by your own regulator, not the DBS or the courts. A few things are worth knowing generally, across most regulators:

Regulators can investigate and act even where there's no criminal conviction

Most use a civil standard of proof (balance of probabilities), lower than a criminal court's

You're generally required to disclose relevant convictions, cautions, or ongoing investigations to your regulator

A regulator can suspend your registration on an interim basis before any final hearing concludes

Some of the regulators you may encounter

Doctors, GMC (General Medical Council): Hearings are held by the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service. A criminal conviction is treated as proof the offence happened.
Nurses and midwives, NMC (Nursing and Midwifery Council): Can investigate concerns about conduct even where police found no criminal offence.
Social workers, Social Work England: The most serious sexual offence convictions trigger automatic removal from the register without a hearing. Other sexual offence convictions are assessed case by case, and are always treated seriously.
Teachers, Teaching Regulation Agency: Can prohibit someone from teaching, separately from any DBS barring decision.
Solicitors and barristers, SRA / Bar Standards Board: Run their own separate disciplinary and fitness to practise processes.

This isn't an exhaustive list, most regulated professions have an equivalent body. If yours isn't listed here, your professional association or union will be able to tell you which regulator applies and what their process involves.

Insight and remediation: what regulators are actually looking for

Across most health and care regulators, "insight" and "remediation" aren't just general goodwill gestures, they're formally named factors decision-makers are required to weigh. The GMC's own published sanctions guidance lists whether a doctor understands what went wrong, and what they've done to address it, as a specific factor tribunals must consider. The NMC has a whole published document, its Remediation and Insight Guidance, built around exactly this question for nurses and midwives. Other regulators generally work on similar principles.

Documented, genuine engagement in therapy, understanding what happened and why, and working to prevent it recurring, is precisely the kind of evidence these frameworks are designed to weigh. This is what a letter on your therapeutic engagement can help demonstrate.

One honest caveat: this isn't a guarantee, and it isn't a negotiation. For the most serious conduct, regulators are explicit that insight and remediation alone won't prevent suspension or removal, if a panel judges the conduct fundamentally incompatible with continued registration, no amount of insight changes that. But for many cases, genuine, demonstrated insight is treated as real and significant evidence, not just a good look.

A note on anonymity

It's a common hope, and worth being honest about: in the legal process itself, anonymity isn't something UK law generally protects for a defendant. Once charged, your name can generally be reported, unlike a complainant, who has lifelong legal anonymity. Before charge, police guidance discourages routinely naming suspects, but this isn't consistently followed in practice, so it's not something to rely on.

What is genuinely confidential is reaching out to us. You don't have to give your name to get in touch, and what you tell us stays private, within the limits explained in our FAQ.

Also worried about contact with your children? See our general guide to family court and Cafcass.

Worried about what you can safely say to us? See our general guide to confidentiality and the police.

If you're in crisis or at immediate risk to yourself or someone else, please call 999, or Samaritans free on 116 123, any time.

Whatever your situation, you don't have to face it alone

We can offer confidential support alongside your solicitor and, if it's useful, a letter documenting your engagement in therapy, exactly the kind of insight and remediation evidence a regulator or a court may take into account.

Get in touch in confidence

About this page: drawn from published guidance from the Disclosure and Barring Service, the General Medical Council's Sanctions Guidance for MPTS panels, the Nursing and Midwifery Council's Remediation and Insight Guidance, and Social Work England, among others. Each regulator's own rules can change, check directly with the relevant body for the current position.

← Back to Pause to Think